Share this
It’s time to recalculate your library’s ROI. Here's how!
by Clare Brown on March 26, 2024
With the end of the fiscal year for many firms fast approaching, it’s time to reassess how you demonstrate your library and information service’s value. Fortunately - unfortunately? - with research demonstrating that workers can spend hours of their time tracking down internal information or colleagues that possess that information, it’s clear that there are ways to quantify your value when the time comes.
If you’re a department or team lead overseeing a knowledge management initiative, it’s important to be able to demonstrate the positive outcomes and return on investment (ROI) of knowledge management. Measuring and communicating ROI is especially critical during times of change or uncertainty when many businesses are adjusting priorities and looking to ensure the most cost-effective investments. How to measure ROI of your knowledge management? (2022)
There are two main approaches to consider, depending on what will work best for your organisation: The quantitative approach, and the qualitative approach. I conclude with some thoughts about a different kind of ROI - return on impact!
The quantitative approach
A quantitative approach is all about the numbers: for each dollar invested into current awareness management, how many dollars does the organisation receive in return?
To decide this, you must determine the total investment your firm has made into knowledge management. This includes staff time, paid resources, and current awareness platforms. Once you’ve figured out how much money goes into knowledge management (KM), you can decide on the appropriate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that assess whether your library and information service is meeting its ultimate aim.
Your internal processes should help you track which cases and clients your work has impacted. Once you tally the value of the business the library has impacted - for existing and new clients - you can use your total investment to come up with a dollar-for-dollar ratio that answers our original question: for each dollar invested in KM, how many does the organisation get back?
The qualitative approach
A qualitative approach is more about using specific examples, such as case studies, to illustrate the impact your library has on the organisation as a whole. Case studies are a powerful way of demonstrating your value, so it all comes down to talking to the right end user.
For instance, if your library’s proactive research uncovered information that allowed your firm to impress and ultimately win a client, that’s a clear indicator that your staff time and other resources are valuable to the organisation. In this case, you might even be able to attach that all-important dollar value to your case study: how much revenue does that client bring to the firm?
For example, a recent conversation with Lisa Paul at Ashurst highlighted the value of their library and information service to end users. She said,
A partner in the UK saw one of the Australian partner’s alerts and read an article of interest. They said, “that's a great opportunity”. They contacted a colleague and explained the potential piece of work. They won the client and got the fee.
A better approach to ROI - Return on Impact?
- Why should we implement a KM program?
- What are the benefits?
- How will it help our organization accomplish its key objectives?
- How will our organization improve as a result?
- How will our people’s needs, opportunities, and challenges be met?
He goes on to mention alternative thoughts on ROI. The quote that stands out to me is from Stephen Dale, who says,
Measuring impact can be just as important as measuring value. The impact might be things like improved customer satisfaction (measured using surveys), or less time to complete a task, or improved staff morale (measured using surveys). Any of these can – and potentially will – have an effect in terms of cash value to the organization, but I firmly believe that converting impact to cash value is an exercise in futility, since more often than not, the formulae and algorithms have too many variables. So, in terms of ‘ROI’, think ‘Return on Impact’ rather than Return on Investment when considering knowledge management strategies, and develop the strategy from the starting point of getting staff to justify the present status quo.
Share this
- October 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (3)
- March 2024 (3)
- February 2024 (4)
- January 2024 (2)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (5)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (2)
- November 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (3)
- October 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (3)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (3)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (3)
- April 2018 (3)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (3)
- January 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (3)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)